LETTER

 
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No. ______ OF 2006


IN THE MATTER OF: -
NATIONAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE FOR CENTRAL
LEGISLATION ON CONSTRUCTION LABOUR (NCC-CL)
THROUGH ITS CO-ORDINATOR,
SUBASH BHATNAGAR,
B-19, SUBHAVANA NIKETAN,
PRITAM PURA,
DELHI-34. …PETITIONER
VERSUS
f. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the Respondents to constitute Central and State Advisory Committee and hold timely meetings of such Advisory Committee to advise the appropriate Government on matters arising out of administration of the said Act,
g. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the Respondents to register establishments employing construction workers, and appoint registering officers, Cess Collectors, registration of building workers as beneficiaries under the said Act and provision for their identity cards,
h. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the Respondents to appoint inspecting staff including Director-General of Inspection at the Central Level and Inspector-General at the State level.
i. Issue a writ, order or direction, directing the Respondents for the appointment of Safety Committee and Safety officers under Section 38 of the Main Act.
j. Issue a writ, order or direction, directing the Respondents to seal every establishment employing fifty or more building workers unless a written policy in respect of safety and health of Building workers is approved from the Chief Inspector of Inspections of Building and
k. For an order directing the Respondent No. 1 to frame rules relating to social security and labour welfare and add them with the Central Rules of 1998 so that they can be adopted by the State Governments to avoid delay in the formation of Expert Committee, framing of rules by the Expert Committee, translation of rules in the regional language and clearance to the rules framed by the Expert Committee by the law department of respective States.
l. Pass such other and further order/s as may be deemed just, fair and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.
   
  AND FOR THIS ACT OF KINDNESS THE PETITIONER AS IN DUTY BOUND SHALL EVER PRAY.
 

Filed by


  JYOTI
MENDIRATTA
ADVOCATE FOR PETITIONER

  Drawn on:
Filed on:
New Delhi.
 
Untitled Document Untitled Document